For any parent thinking about the future, the cost of college is a looming concern. The familiar landscape of FAFSA forms, Pell Grants, and student loans has been the standard for decades. But that landscape is on the verge of a dramatic transformation.
Right now, Congress is debating a sweeping overhaul of the federal financial aid system, packaged in a bill known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” With a mandate to trim as much as $350 billion from the higher education budget over the next decade, this legislation promises to reshape how American families pay for college.
Both the House and the Senate have released their versions of the bill, and while they share some common goals, their differences highlight a fierce debate about access, affordability, and accountability. Here’s a breakdown of what parents of future college students need to know.
Key Protections: What the Senate’s Plan Aims to Save
When the House passed its version of the bill, college access advocates raised serious alarms. The proposal included drastic cuts that could have priced many low-income and non-traditional students out of higher education entirely. The Senate’s recently released counter-proposal has walked back some of these more controversial measures, bringing a sigh of relief to many.
Here are the key programs the Senate bill currently protects:
- Pell Grants for Part-Time Students: The House bill proposed cutting off Pell Grant access for students taking fewer than 7.5 credit hours and increasing the course load required for a full grant. This would have impacted millions of students, particularly working adults and parents attending college part-time. The Senate version scraps this change, protecting a vital lifeline for non-traditional students.
- Subsidized Student Loans: For decades, undergraduate students with financial need have relied on subsidized loans, where the government pays the interest while the student is in school. The House wanted to eliminate this program entirely. The Senate proposal preserves it, a major win for keeping debt manageable for low- and middle-income families.
- Protections for Veterans: The Senate bill also maintains a key regulation that protects student veterans from the predatory practices of some for-profit colleges—a rule the House sought to eliminate.
Navigating the New Landscape: Major Changes Still on the Table
While the Senate’s bill is seen as an improvement, it still represents a fundamental shift in federal aid. Several of the House’s core provisions remain, making them highly likely to be included in any final version.
- Caps on Graduate and Professional Loans: Both chambers agree on capping the amount students can borrow for post-baccalaureate degrees. While the exact limits differ slightly, families should anticipate that federal loans may no longer cover the full cost of many graduate or professional programs.
- Expansion of “Workforce Pell”: In a major shift, the bill would expand Pell Grant eligibility to cover short-term credential programs that run from 8 to 15 weeks. This could be a boon for community colleges and students seeking a faster path to the workforce, but it also raises concerns about quality control for newly eligible programs.
- Simplified (But Fewer) Repayment Options: The current maze of income-driven repayment plans would be cut down to just one or two options. While this promises simplicity, student advocacy groups worry it will make repayment harder for the lowest-income borrowers.
The Great Debate: How to Hold Colleges Accountable
Perhaps the biggest fight between the House and Senate versions comes down to one question: How should the government hold colleges accountable for student success and debt? Each chamber has a radically different philosophy.
-
The House Plan: “Risk-Sharing” The House proposes forcing colleges to have “skin in the game.” Under this model, institutions would be forced to pay a penalty based on the volume of their students’ unpaid loans. Proponents argue this would directly incentivize colleges to lower costs and ensure their students are employable.
-
The Senate Plan: “Gainful Employment 2.0” The Senate takes a different approach, focusing on “up-front accountability.” Similar to the gainful-employment rule from the Obama-Biden era, this plan ties a program’s access to federal aid to the earnings of its graduates. If students graduating from a specific program don’t earn more than an adult with only a high school diploma, that program could lose its eligibility for federal loans.
The final bill will likely be a battle between these two competing ideas—one a back-end penalty, the other a front-end quality check.
What’s Next for Families?
While an ambitious July 4th deadline was initially set, it’s more likely that a final bill will be negotiated and reach the president’s desk later this summer. The last hurdles will hinge on the core disagreements: the accountability measures and the final price tag, with the House plan saving an estimated $350 billion and the Senate’s saving $300 billion.
For parents, the message is clear: the rules of the game are changing. While the preservation of subsidized loans and full Pell Grant access in the Senate bill is welcome news, the financial aid system your future student encounters will almost certainly be different from the one that exists today. Staying informed on these changes will be more critical than ever in planning your child’s educational journey, so if you have any concerns, please feel free to schedule time with me and let’s talk.
